Influencing factors for the development of obstructive sleep apnea after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients: A systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to investigate the factors that may contribute to the development of OSA after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III. Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were conducted up to December 10, 2022. In total, 277 studies were retrieved and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 14 were finally selected. All studies were of medium quality (moderate risk of bias). The occurrence of OSA after orthognathic surgery in patients with class III skeletal relationships depends on surgical factors and patient self-factors. Surgical factors include surgery type, amount of maxillary and mandibular movement, and the patient's postoperative swelling. Patient self-factors include weight, age, gender, and hypertrophy of the soft palate, tonsils, and tongue. According to information in the 14 selected articles, the incidences of OSA after Le Fort I impaction and BSSO setback, BSSO setback, and Le Fort I advancement and BSSO setback were 19.2%, 8.57%, and 0.7%, respectively, mostly accompanied with greater amounts of mandibular recession. However, no clear evidence exists to confirm that orthognathic surgery is a causative factor for postoperative sleep breathing disorders in patients with mandibular prognathism. The wider upper airway in patients with class III skeletal might be the reason for the rare occurrence of OSA after surgery. In addition, obesity and advanced age may lead to sleep apnea after orthognathic surgery. Obese patients should be advised to lose weight preoperatively.

Comparative Analysis of Temperature-Responsive Hydrogel (PF 72) for Postoperative Pain After Bimaxillary Surgery: A Retro-spective Study.

Bimaxillary surgery is a painful invasive procedure in plastic surgery. Pain control is typically achieved using intravenous analgesics. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel temperature-responsive hydrogel, PF72, mixed with ropivacaine, as a local pain management solution when applied directly to the surgical site following orthognathic surgery. The study was conducted from October 2022 to July 2023 and included a cohort of 40 candidates for orthognathic surgery, encompassing LeFort I maxillary ostectomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The participants were divided into an Injection group (n = 20), where PF72 was administered at the surgical site before the orthognathic surgery, and a Control group (n = 20), which relied solely on intravenous analgesics. Pain was evaluated at 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The mean NRS scores at 24 h were 6.35 and 4 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. The mean NRS scores at 72 h were 3.4 and 2.55 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. Patients who received PF72 experienced less pain than those who received intravenous analgesics. These findings underscore the potential of PF72 as an effective alternative for enhancing pain management in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.Level of Evidence III Therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Does Anesthesiologist Experience Influence Early Postoperative Outcomes Following Orthognathic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia provider experience impacts nausea and vomiting in other surgical specialties but its influence within orthognathic surgery remains unclear. PURPOSE: The study purpose was to evaluate whether anesthesiologist experience with orthognathic surgery impacts postoperative outcomes, including nausea, emesis, narcotic use, and perioperative adverse events, for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a retrospective cohort study of subjects aged 12 to 35 years old who underwent orthognathic surgery, including Le Fort 1 osteotomy ± bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, at Boston Children's Hospital from August 2018 to January 2022. Subjects were excluded if they had incomplete medical records, a syndromic diagnosis, or a hospital stay of greater than 2 days. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was attending anesthesia provider experience with orthognathic surgery. Providers were classified as experienced or inexperienced, with experienced providers defined as having anesthetized ≥10 orthognathic operations during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was postoperative nausea. Secondary outcome variables were emesis, narcotic use in the hospital, and perioperative adverse events within 30 days of their operation. COVARIATES: Study covariates included age, sex, race, comorbidities (body mass index, history of psychiatric illness, cleft lip and/or palate, chronic pain, postoperative nausea/vomiting, gastrointestinal conditions), enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enrollment, and intraoperative factors (operation performed, anesthesia/procedure times, estimated blood loss, intravenous fluid and narcotic administration, and anesthesiologist's years in practice). ANALYSES: χ2 and unpaired t-tests were used to compare primary predictor and covariates against outcome variables. A P-value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 118 subjects included in the study after 4 were excluded (51.7% female, mean age 19.1 ± 3.30 years). There were 71 operations performed by 5 experienced anesthesiologists (mean cases/provider 15.4 ± 5.95) and 47 cases by 22 different inexperienced providers (mean cases/provider 1.91 ± 1.16). The nausea rate was 52.1% for experienced providers and 53.2% for inexperienced providers (P = .909). There were no statistically significant associations between anesthesiologist experience and any outcome variable (P > .341). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Anesthesia providers' experience with orthognathic surgery did not significantly influence postoperative nausea, emesis, narcotic use, or perioperative adverse events.

Optimizing drug regimens and supplementation in orthognathic surgery: A comprehensive and practical guide.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to comprehensively review the literature and provide a practical guide for optimizing drug regimens and supplementation related to orthognathic surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted a thorough review of the existing literature, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Various types of studies except case reports and reviews were included. The study applied specific inclusion criteria, focusing on perioperative and/or postoperative drugs, medications, or supplementation related to orthognathic surgery. RESULTS: This guide included 78 studies on various medications in orthognathic surgery. It encompasses clinical trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, prospective and retrospective studies. The topics covered include antibiotics, analgesics, corticosteroids, antiemetics, hemostatic agents, local anesthetics, herbal medicine, and botulinum toxin. Pain and edema control involved specific medications, while local anesthesia utilized ropivacaine and bupivacaine. The guide also discusses mineral and vitamin supplementation. The effectiveness of hemostatic agents and antiemetics was highlighted. CONCLUSION: Pain management, reduced swelling, enhanced wound healing, and faster recovery are among the advantages. In addition to the standard drugs and medications, the inclusion of vitamin and mineral supplements, tranexamic acid, postoperative anesthetic blocks, and preemptive antiemetics is anticipated to offer various benefits in orthognathic surgery, despite the limited available evidence.

Successful rehabilitation after multiple severe complications following orthognathic surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Complications of orthognathic surgery are quite rare, but they cause suffering in affected individuals. The range of complications is broad and includes both hard and soft tissue. CASE PRESENTATION: We here present a case of a fully healthy woman without signs of impaired healing capacity. The patient underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery and experienced multiple complications both peri- and post-operatively. During the post operative period, the patient also suffered from soft tissue complications after an orthopaedic injury. Therefore, we referred the patient to her general practitioner for further medical investigation. We also present the result after restorative surgery and endodontic and prosthodontic treatment resulting in a successful rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: This case report clearly shows the need for a good collaboration between different odontological and medical fields to achieve a good and predictable result. In situations where normal healing processes do not occur, in-depth analysis must be carried out. HIGHLIGHTS: Orthognathic surgery affects soft and hard tissue which can result in adverse healing and complications. It is of great importance to follow up performed surgery to see late complications. Be restrictive with early re-operations when there are signs of necrosis. Always use a multidisciplinary approach when handling complications after surgery.

[Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint].

Orthognathic surgery changes the jaw position and occlusion, and also affects the original structure and function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). With the widespread development of orthognathic surgery, the impact of orthognathic surgery on the structure and function of the TMJ is increasingly valued, and the importance of the TMJ in orthognathic surgery is gradually recognized. Proper understanding the relationship between orthognathic surgery and TMJ not only helps to elucidate how the orthognathic surgery affects the condyle and causes temporomandibular disorders (TMD), but also has significant clinical significance in preventing and treating TMD in patients underwent orthognathic surgery.

Factors affecting progressive facial swelling immediately after orthognathic surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

The aim of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with progressive facial swelling after orthognathic surgery. Patients diagnosed with jaw deformities and undergoing orthognathic surgery were retrospectively evaluated, and those with surgical site infection, Le Fort I osteotomy, or genioplasty only were excluded. Facial swelling volume was calculated by comparing facial volume preoperatively and three days postoperatively using 3D images and image analysis software (VECTRA H2). FXIII was measured within three days after surgery in only patients with unexplained postoperative bleeding or hematoma. The correlation between facial swelling volume and clinical factors was statistically analyzed. Facial swelling volume was examined in 78 patients. Univariate analysis showed a significant difference between facial swelling volume (mean = 41.6 cm3) and operation time (mean = 209.3 min, r = 0.283, p = 0.012), ΔHb level (mean = 1.18 g/dL, r = 0.235, p = 0.039), as well as decreased factor XIII activity (mean = 75.3%, p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed a significant difference between facial swelling volume and FXIII deficiency (standard error = 6.44, p = 0.031).Progressive facial swelling immediately after orthognathic surgery may be due to factor XIII deficiency.

Incidence of Otalgia After Orthognathic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In orthognathic surgery, it is well known that maxillary osteotomies and displacements sometimes affect auditory function. Thus, this study examined the relationship between the direction of maxillary displacement and postoperative otalgia. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients underwent Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy using advancement, impaction, setback, or a combination of these procedures. The direction of movement and incidence of otalgia were investigated. Patients provided informed consent preoperatively, and postoperative reassurance was prudent. RESULTS: Pure-tone average evaluation based on horizontal or vertical movements did not show significant differences, although vertical movements resulted in fewer changes in the hearing threshold. Specifically, no significant changes were observed in the hearing thresholds of patients after surgery. No significant difference was also observed between horizontal and vertical movements in the tympanometry results. Negative changes were found in the results of the Eustachian tube dysfunction test in vertical movements, which returned to preoperative values in the final test. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of minor changes in hearing function is probable during the first week after orthognathic surgery; however, these negative changes either completely disappear or remain negligible.

Nutritional state of orthognathic surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Is to systematically review the available evidence of the patient's nutritional state before and after orthognathic surgery METHODS: The protocol to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration No. CRD42020177156). RESULTS: The search strategy yielded a total of 43 articles from all databases. Of the 43 articles, 13 were excluded after an examination of the titles and abstracts, and full-text articles of the remaining 30 studies were reviewed independently for eligibility. Of these 30 studies, 23 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were processed for critical review CONCLUSION: Patient's body weight and body mass index (BMI) decreases after orthognathic surgery. No significant changes in body fat percentage were observed. The estimated blood loss and the need for blood transfusion increased. No significant changes were observed in hemoglobin levels, lymphocyte counts, total cholesterol levels, and cholinesterase levels between the pre-operative and postoperative periods. Increments in serum albumin levels and total protein counts were observed after orthognathic surgery.

Autoimmune diseases and orthognathic surgery: A case series of 12 patients.

Autoimmune diseases result from the immune system attacking native cells and tissues due to the recognition of "self" antigens as foreign antigens. This group of disorders is associated with an increased risk of complications after surgical interventions, as the immune system may cause tissue destruction. The study aimed to investigate the risk of surgical complications in patients with autoimmune diseases, who are at a higher risk of complications due to their condition. Among 886 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery, twelve types of autoimmune diseases with 22 patients were identified. For this case-series study, 12 patients were selected with a follow-up period of at least two years. The surgical procedures were executed by a single surgical team, which involved single or multi-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, Hunsuck/Epker modification of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO), and/or genioplasty. The recorded outcome variables were postoperative adverse events, including respiratory or blood-related complications, wound infection, neurosensory disturbances, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) complications, and relapse. Only two patients recovered after surgery without any postoperative complications, whereas others had delayed recovery from neurosensory disturbance (5/12), infection (5/12), TMJ complications (2/12), and other complications. The findings of this study suggest that patients with autoimmune diseases undergoing orthognathic surgery are at higher risk of complications, highlighting the importance of careful consideration of patient selection and risk stratification before surgical intervention. The study also emphasizes the importance of close postoperative follow-up to detect and manage complications promptly.

Condylar Resorption After Orthognathic Surgery: A Review of Risk Factors With a Proposed Algorithm of Treatment.

This study aimed to critically reanalyze systematic reviews of patients suffering from condylar resorption (CR) and summarize the current scientific pieces of evidence with a focus on a possible relationship between CR and orthognathic surgery (OS). The work followed the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol" guidelines and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42020168660). The search strategy produced 143 articles. After reading the abstracts, 113 articles were excluded, and the full-text articles in English of the remaining 30 studies were separately examined for eligibility by 2 authors, with 20 of them being excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 10 systematic reviews were processed for critical evaluation. Young female patients with a high mandibular plane angle, diminished posterior facial height, posteriorly inclined condylar neck, and a counter-clockwise jaw rotation, are more likely to develop CR after OS. The most common procedure associated with CR in the included systematic reviews was the bimaxillary OS followed by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Hence, extreme caution and surgical modification should be used in these high-risk conditions. There is still a need for more evidence on the risks of OS or iatrogenic factors during the fixation of various osteosynthesis devices because it is still inconclusive and requires further justification.

Evaluation of surgical techniques in survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome [zygomatic implant (ZI) survival] and complications of the original surgical technique (OST) and an Anatomy-Guided approach (AGA) in the placement of ZI in patients with severely atrophic maxillae. METHODS: Two independent reviewers conducted an electronic literature search from January 2000 to August 2022. The inclusion criteria were articles reporting at least five patients with severely atrophic edentulous maxilla undergoing placement OST and/or AGA, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Number of patients, defect characteristics, number of ZI, implant details, surgical technique, survival rate, loading protocol, prosthetic rehabilitation, complications, and follow-up period were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies comprised 2194 ZI in 918 patients with 41 failures. The ZI survival rate was 90.3-100% in OST and 90.4-100% in AGA. Probability of complications with ZI with OST was as follows: sinusitis, 9.53%; soft tissue infection, 7.50%; paresthesia, 10.78%; oroantral fistulas, 4.58%; and direct surgical complication, 6.91%. With AGA, the presenting complications were as follows: sinusitis, 4.39%; soft tissue infection, 4.35%; paresthesia, 0.55%; oroantral fistulas, 1.71%; and direct surgical complication, 1.60%. The prevalence of immediate loading protocol was 22.3% in OST and 89.6% in the AGA. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, statistical comparison was only possible after the descriptive analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current systematic review, placing ZI in severely atrophic edentulous maxillae rehabilitation with the OST and AGA is associated with a high implant survival rate and surgical complications within a minimum of 6 months follow-up. Complications, including sinusitis and soft tissue infection around the implant, are the most common. The utilization of immediate loading protocol is more observed in AGA than in OST.

Effects of counterclockwise bimaxillary advancement surgery and relapse on upper airway.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term volumetric changes of the upper airway compartments in response to counterclockwise bimaxillary advancement surgery with multi-piece maxillary osteotomy, and to analyse the relationship between the postoperative stability of the maxillomandibular skeletal complex, and the volumetric airway changes over-time. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-seven sets of pre (T0), post (T1) and follow-up (T2) (20.15 months) CBCT scans were used. The upper airway was isolated into five compartments: soft and bony nasal cavity (SNC, BNC), nasopharynx (NP), oropharynx (OP) and hypopharynx (HP) using Mimics V.22 software. The volumetric changes and the correlation between the airway change and the skeletal movements were analysed using repeated measure ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation coefficient, respectively. RESULTS: The results showed a significant decrease in SNC and BNC (10.94% and 7.69%, p < .05) at T1. However, SNC presented a significant recovery (11.73%, p < .05) at T2. NP, OP and HP segments presented significant and stable increases over time (10.41%, 53.62%, 24.70%, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This surgical approach produced a significant increase in OP and HP volumes in short and long term without a significant relapse, NP showed a significant increase in long term only, SNC and BNC volumes showed a significant decrease post-surgery which was only partially maintained for BNC.

Orthognathic surgery in patients with systemic diseases.

PURPOSE: To review the experience with orthognathic surgery in patients with systemic diseases, syndromic conditions or an oncological history at a tertiary center. METHODS: All patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery and all patients who were considered for orthognathic surgery between January 2013 and August 2020 at a tertiary center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with cleft lip/palate and orthognathic patients requiring craniofacial surgery or reconstructive surgery were excluded. Patients with an underlying disorder were identified and divided into 3 categories: systemic disease, syndromic condition, or oncological disease treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy of the head and neck. Data on intraoperative and postoperative complications until 3 months after surgery were collected for the patients who had undergone surgery. If orthognathic surgery was contraindicated, the reason was extracted from the patient's medical record. RESULTS: Eighty out of 1049 orthognathic patients had an underlying disorder (7.6%), including 50 patients with at least one systemic disease, 25 patients with a syndromic condition, and 5 patients with an oncological disease. A complication was encountered in respectively 5 (10%), 9 (36%), and 0 (0%) patients. Three out of 1134 patients who consulted the multidisciplinary orthognathic-orthodontic consultation had a contraindication for orthognathic surgery because of an underlying disease (0.3%). CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications in patients with an underlying disorder are not frequent. Contraindications for orthognathic surgery because of a medical condition are very rare.

Automated three-dimensional quantification of external root resorption following combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment. A validation study.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional (3D) quantitative assessment of external root resorption (ERR) following combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment is vital for ensuring an optimal long-term tooth prognosis. In this era, lack of evidence exists applying automated 3D approaches for assessing ERR. Therefore, this study aimed to validate a protocol for 3D quantification of ERR on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images following combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment were recruited. Each patient had CBCT scans acquired with NewTom VGi evo (NewTom) at three time-points i.e., 4-weeks prior to surgery (T0), 1-week (T1) and 1-year after surgery (T2). Patients were divided into two groups, group A (surgical Le Fort I osteotomy group: 10 patients) and group B (orthodontic group without maxillary surgical intervention: 10 patients). Root resorption was assessed by measuring length and volumetric changes of maxillary premolar to premolar teeth (central and lateral incisors, canines, 1st and 2nd premolars= 10 teeth) at T0-T1 and T0-T2 time intervals in both groups. The protocol consisted of convolutional neural network based segmentation followed by surface-based superimposition and automated 3D analysis. RESULTS: The intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was found to be excellent (1.0) with an average error of 0 mm and 0 mm3 for assessing root length and volume, respectively. The entire protocol took 56.8 ± 7 s for quantifying ERR. Both group of patients showed negligible changes in length and volumetric ratio at T0-T1 time-interval. Furthermore, group A had lower ERR ratio with decreased root volume and length compared to group B at T0-T2 time-interval. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed protocol was found to be time efficient, accurate and reliable for 3D quantification of ERR on CBCT images. It could act as a viable automated option for assessing ERR. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The automated protocol could provide a time efficient method to allow a reliable and accurate 3D follow up root resorption after orthognathic and orthodontic treatment procedures. These new insights could allow clinicians to implement strategies for minimizing the risk of root resorption and to further enhance treatment predictability.

[Condylar displacement following orthognathic surgery]. / Dislokatsiya sustavnykh golovok nizhnei chelyusti v rezul'tate ortognaticheskoi operatsii.

The overview of the current literature in the research of mandibular condyle displacement after orthognathic surgeries was done. The correct postoperative mandibular condyle position is considered as one of the determinants of the stability of treatment results.

Incidence of inferior alveolar nerve sensory deficit and intra-operative nerve encounters after advancement of retrognathic mandible - A cross-sectional survey study.

Aims and Objectives: The aim of the current cross-sectional study was to conduct a survey among the oral and maxillofacial surgeons of South India regarding their experiences of incidence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) neurosensory deficit after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) for correction of mandibular retrognathism and to assess the intra-operative nerve encounters and its effect on the inferior alveolar neurosensory deficit (NSD), 6 months post-operatively. Materials and Methods: A self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) was prepared using Google Forms (Google Inc.) and sent to the prospective participants through various social media outlets such as Facebook, WhatsApp groups etc., of the maxillofacial surgery specialty for a period of 3 months. SAQ from surgeons with more than 5 years of experience in orthognathic surgery were included. Results: The incidence of NSD post-BSSO advancement surgery from 859 cases after 6 months was 15.1% (130). After splitting the mandible, the IAN was seen in the proximal fragment in 472 sites and needed dissection. The nerve was transected and neurorrhaphy was carried out in 26 sites. A Chi-square test was used to analyse the qualitative variables. The IAN was not visible post-osteotomy in 140 sites and in the distal fragment in 1080 sites. These groups had decreased incidence of NSD. The NSD was significantly higher in cases where the nerve was transected and sutured, P value <0.001 as compared with the other nerve status, followed by the nerve in the proximal fragment needing dissection. Conclusion: The IAN status intra-operatively can be assumed to have a significant role in persisting NSD.

Lateral Pterygoid Muscle Ossification After Intraoral Condylectomy.

PURPOSE: Lateral pterygoid muscle ossification has not been reported in condylectomy patients. This study aimed to explore the incidence, risk factors, and imaging characteristics of 38 cases with lateral pterygoid muscle ossification among 54 patients after condylectomy via intraoral approach. METHODS: This retrospective study included 54 patients following simultaneous orthognathic surgery and condylectomy with coronoid process resection via intraoral approach. The authors evaluated the preoperative, 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year or more postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans for the presence of lateral pterygoid muscle ossification and its characteristics. Sex, age at the time of surgery, disease course, affected side, preoperative alkaline phosphatase, pathology diagnosis, the height of the removed condyle, condylar shape, operator, preoperative temporomandibular joint movement, and clinical symptoms were assessed as risk factors for ossification. RESULTS: No incidence of lateral pterygoid muscle ossification was found on preoperative CT images. Various small-size osseous masses were observed in the lateral pterygoid muscles on postoperative 6 months CT images in 38/54 patients (70.37%) after condylectomy. But no apparent enlargement of the osseous masses was found. No patients complained of clinical discomfort or functional disorder during the follow-up period (23.11 ± 13.16 months). No significant risk factors for ossification were found. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral pterygoid muscle ossification is relatively common in patients after condylectomy via intraoral approach. However, its enlargement is self-limited and remains stable 6 months after surgery. it has no adverse effects on the temporomandibular joint functional movement.

Influence of systemic comorbidities on the complications of orthognathic surgery: A scoping review.

The potential impact of systemic comorbidities has not yet been thoroughly explored in orthognathic surgery. Therefore, the following scoping review was conducted to accumulate evidence on the possible impact of systemic comorbidities on the orthognathic surgery complications. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched up to April 2022 to identify studies about patients with systemic comorbidities who underwent orthognathic surgery. A total of 12,938 articles were screened, and seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Only one study had control group, other six articles had a non-comparative study design. The current evidence suggests a high impact of rheumatic diseases and neuromuscular disorders on the surgery- and patient-related postoperative complications following orthognathic surgery. At the same instance, the findings of the review should be interpreted with caution due to a lack of substantial evidence for extrapolating the findings to a contemporary surgical practice.